The Deferential English: A Comparative Critique
- 1 July 1971
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Government and Opposition
- Vol. 6 (3) , 333-360
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1971.tb00818.x
Abstract
ALL POLITICAL CULTURES ARE MIXED AND CHANGING. WHAT IS interesting in the English case, however, is the way in which a veritable army of scholars has seized on the deferential component. Other features in the overall cultural pattern have been neglected. This paper is devoted to an examination of the concept of deference as it is applied to English politics. In particular it will focus on the different meanings that the concept has assumed in the literature describing and analysing the popular political attitudes, and those aspects of the political system, including stability, which it has been used to explain. My concluding argument is that deference, as the concept is frequently applied to English political culture, has attained the status of a stereotype and that it is applied to such variegated and sometimes conflicting data that it has outlived its usefulness as a term in academic currency.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Capitalism, Socialism and DemocracyForeign Affairs, 1997
- The State in Capitalist Society.American Sociological Review, 1970
- The Variability of Party Government: A Theoretical and Empirical CritiquePolitical Studies, 1969
- THE REFORM OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING: FROM DONOVAN TO DURKHEIMBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1969
- Elite Education and Political ValuesPolitical Studies, 1968
- Representative Bureaucracy: A ReassessmentAmerican Political Science Review, 1967
- Political IdeologyBritish Journal of Sociology, 1965
- Party and SocietyReview of Religious Research, 1965
- British Government ObservedPublic Administration, 1964
- The Uses of LiteracyBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1957