The further validation and precision of the NIAF-R
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Brain Injury
- Vol. 12 (2) , 155-164
- https://doi.org/10.1080/026990598122782
Abstract
It is essential that any tool which is measuring outcome following head injury is sensitive to change over time. The Newcastle Independence Assessment Form-Research (NIAF-R) has been developed to be appropriate and applicable both in the acute situation and in the long term. This paper illustrates the NIAF-R's level of sensitivity to change over time from eight weeks through to one year post injury. There were no ceiling effects demonstrated at follow up. Such effects can be a problem with other comparable measures. In addition, the results of further concurrent validation with the Barthel index, are reported. The NIAF-R scoring is refined through the development of an Adjusted Severity Indicator for more stringent analysis of level of independence. Scoring can now provide data in 55 individual areas of function for each subject or alternatively give an overall measure of severity of functional independence. Finally, this paper demonstrates the ability of the NIAF-R to predict out come at follow up.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a literature review and recommendationsBrain Injury, 1995
- Stability of functional outcomes following transitional living programme participation: 3-year follow-upBrain Injury, 1994
- Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indicesJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1993
- Primary caregiver distress following severe head injuryJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1991
- Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the Modified Barthel Index and the 'adapted' Functional Independence MeasureClinical Rehabilitation, 1990
- An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel IndexInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1988
- The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability?International Disability Studies, 1988
- Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessmentJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status MeasureMedical Care, 1981