Programming of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators on the Basis of the Upper Limit of Vulnerability
- 18 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 95 (6) , 1497-1504
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1497
Abstract
Background A patient-specific measure of defibrillation efficacy that requires a minimum number of ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes would be valuable for programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) is the weakest shock strength at or above which VF is not induced when a stimulus is delivered during the vulnerable phase of the cardiac cycle. It correlates with the defibrillation threshold (DFT) and can be determined with a single episode of VF. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that ICDs programmed on the basis of the ULV convert spontaneous ICD-detected VF reliably. Methods and Results We studied 100 consecutive patients at ICD implantation and during follow-up of 20±7 months. At implantation, the ULV and DFT were determined, and the ICD system was tested at a shock strength equal to the ULV+3 J. During follow-up, the strength of the first shock was programmed to the ULV+5 J for arrhythmias detected in the VF zone (cycle length Conclusions ICD shocks can be programmed on the basis of the ULV, a measurement made in regular rhythm, without a direct measure of defibrillation efficacy.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous intplantable defibrillator without an active canThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- A new transvenous internal cardioverter-defibrillator: Implantation technique, complications, and short-term follow-upAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Epicardial and Nonthoracotomy Defibrillation Lead Systems Combined with a Cardioverter DefibrillatorPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Hemodynamic deterioration during ICD implant: Predictors of high-risk patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- Factors Associated with Implantation‐Related ComplicationsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Value of ventricular electrogram recordings in the diagnosis of arrhythmias precipitating electrical device shock therapyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Defibrillation Threshold Testing and Other Practices Related to AICD Implantation: Do All Roads Lead to Rome?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- Defibrillation threshold testing: Necessary but evil?American Heart Journal, 1989