Improving Residents' Compliance With Standards of Ambulatory CareResults From the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders
- 20 September 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 284 (11) , 1411-1416
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.11.1411
Abstract
Context Computerized systems to remind physicians to provide appropriate care have not been widely evaluated in large numbers of patients in multiple clinical settings. Objective To examine whether a computerized reminder system operating in multiple Veterans Affairs (VA) ambulatory care clinics improves resident physician compliance with standards of ambulatory care. Design, Setting, and Participants A total of 275 resident physicians at 12 VA medical centers were randomly assigned in firms or half-day clinic blocks to either a reminder group (n = 132) or a control group (n = 143). During a 17-month study period (January 31, 1995–June 30, 1996), the residents cared for 12,989 unique patients for whom at least 1 of the studied standards of care (SOC) was applicable. Main Outcome Measures Compliance with 13 SOC, tracked using hospital databases and encounter forms completed by residents, compared between residents in the reminder group vs those in the control group. Results Measuring compliance as the proportion of patients in compliance with all applicable SOC by their last visit during the study period, the reminder group had statistically significantly higher rates of compliance than the control group for all standards combined (58.8% vs 53.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.42; P = .002) and for 5 of the 13 standards examined individually. Measuring compliance as the proportion of all visits for which care was indicated in which residents provided proper care, the reminder group also had statistically significantly higher rates of compliance than the control group for all standards combined (17.9% vs 12.2%; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.45-1.71; P<.001) and for 9 of the 13 standards examined individually. The benefit of reminders, however, declined throughout the course of the study, even though the reminders remained active. Conclusions Our data indicate that reminder systems installed at multiple sites can improve residents' compliance to multiple SOC. The benefits of such systems, however, appear to deteriorate over time. Future research needs to explore methods to better sustain the benefits of reminders.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials to Evaluate Computer-Based Clinical Reminder Systems for Preventive Care in the Ambulatory SettingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996
- Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocolsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1993
- A Randomized Trial of Computerized Reminders for Blood Pressure Screening in Primary CareMedical Care, 1989
- Delayed Feedback of Physician Performance Versus Immediate Reminders to Perform Preventive CareMedical Care, 1986
- Reminders to Physicians from an Introspective Computer Medical RecordAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1984
- A Computer-Based Monitoring System for Follow-Up of Elevated Blood PressureMedical Care, 1983
- A Computer-Derived Protocol to Aid in the Diagnosis of Emergency Room Patients with Acute Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Quality Assurance through Automated Monitoring and Concurrent Feedback Using a Computer-Based Medical Information SystemMedical Care, 1978
- Protocol-Based Computer Reminders, the Quality of Care and the Non-Perfectability of ManNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- Use of a Computer to Detect and Respond to Clinical Events: Its Effect on Clinician BehaviorAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1976