Characterization of P1‐purinoceptors on rat duodenum and urinary bladder
Open Access
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 105 (3) , 639-642
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb09032.x
Abstract
The P1‐purinoceptors mediating relaxation of the rat duodenum and inhibition of contraction of the rat urinary bladder were characterized by use of adenosine and its analogues 5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), N6‐cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and 2‐p‐((carboxyethyl)phenethylamino)‐5′‐carboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680), as well as the A1‐selective antagonist 1,3‐dipropyl‐8‐cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX). The stable analogue of adenosine 5′‐triphosphate (ATP), adenylyl 5′‐(β,γ‐methylene)diphosphonate (AMPPCP), was also used as previous work had indicated that it has a direct action on some P1 receptors in addition to its P2‐purinoceptor activity. In the rat duodenum, the order of potency of the adenosine agonists was NECA ≥ CPA > AMPPCP = adenosine > CGS 21680, and DPCPX antagonized CPA and AMPPCP at a concentration of 1 nm whereas equivalent antagonism of NECA and adenosine required a concentration of 1 μm. This suggests the presence of a mixture of A1 and A2 receptors in this tissue, with CPA and AMPPCP acting on the A1 and NECA and adenosine acting on the A2 receptors. In the rat bladder, the order of potency of the adenosine agonists for inhibition of carbachol‐induced contractions was NECA ≫ adenosine > CPA = CGS 21680, and a concentration of DPCPX of 1 μm was required to antagonize responses to NECA and adenosine. This suggests the presence of A2 receptors in this tissue. ATP and AMPPCP each caused contractions which were not enhanced by DPCPX (1 μm) which suggests that in this tissue AMPPCP was acting only via P2 receptors and had no P1 agonist activity. That AMPPCP was active on the A1 receptors in the duodenum but inactive on the A2 receptors in the bladder implies that it has selectivity for the A1 subtype. That CGS 21680, which has been reported to bind selectively to the high affinity A2a subclass of A2 receptors, had a very low potency on the A2 receptors in the duodenum and in the bladder suggests that these receptors are of the low affinity A2b subclass.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is there a basis for distinguishing two types of P2-purinoceptor?Published by Elsevier ,2002
- Subtypes of P2‐PurinoceptorsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1990
- Overview: Purinergic MechanismsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1990
- Adenosine ReceptorsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1990
- A Comparison of Ectonucleotidase Activities on Vascular Endothelial and Smooth Muscle CellsaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1990
- The coexistence of adenosine A1 and A2 receptors in guinea-pig aortaEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1990
- Role of adenine compounds in autonomic neurotransmissionPharmacology & Therapeutics, 1988
- Adenosine receptors and calcium: Basis for proposing a third (A3) adenosine receptorProgress in Neurobiology, 1986
- ATP analogues and the guinea-pig taenia coli: a comparison of the structure-activity relationships of ectonucleotidases with those of the P2-purinoceptorEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1986
- Further evidence for involvement of adenosine-5′-triphosphate in non-adrenergic non-cholinergic relaxation of the isolated rat duodenumEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1985