Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Existing Group Randomized Trials
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 29 (3) , 241-267
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x04273257
Abstract
This study describes a method for incorporating external estimates of intraclass correlation to improve the precision for the analysis of an existing group-randomized trial. The authors use a random-effects meta-analytic approach to pool the information across studies, which takes into account any interstudy heterogeneity that may exist. This approach can be used in several different situations to estimate the degrees of freedom available for an adjusted test of the intervention effect in a study where the challenges of group-randomized trials were not fully considered when the study was planned. The authors discuss the limitations of this approach and the circumstances in which it is likely to be helpful.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Power and Measures of Effect Size in Analysis of Variance With Fixed Versus Random Nested Factors.Psychological Methods, 2003
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Clinic-Based Support Staff Intervention to Increase the Rate of Fecal Occult Blood Test OrderingPreventive Medicine, 2000
- Batch Sampling To Improve Power in a Community TrialEvaluation Review, 1996
- PARAMETERS TO AID IN THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY TRIALSEpidemiology, 1994
- Exchangeability and Data AnalysisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Bayes Methods for Combining the Results of Cancer Studies in Humans and other SpeciesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- Design considerations in the estimation of intraclass correlationAnnals of Human Genetics, 1982
- The Minnesota Smoking Prevention ProgramJournal of School Health, 1981