The Relationship Between Medical Practice Characteristics and Quality of Care for Cardiovascular Disease
- 28 November 2007
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Care Research and Review
- Vol. 65 (2) , 167-186
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707310208
Abstract
The settings in which health care services are delivered have the potential to influence the quality of health care services in numerous ways, but little is known about the relationship between characteristics of medical practices and quality of care. In this study, the authors studied patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The authors surveyed 225 medical practices in 2000 and 2001 and obtained information on quality measures from the medical records for more than 1,600 of their patients with CHD. Results suggest that quality of care, at least for common conditions with agreed-on measures, is not strongly influenced by financial characteristics of medical practices, although there does seem to be some relationship with practice structure such as size and quality.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value Of Electronic Health Records In Solo Or Small Group PracticesHealth Affairs, 2005
- Characteristics of Medical Practices in Three Developed Managed Care MarketsHealth Services Research, 2005
- Tracking Health Care Costs: Trends Turn Downward In 2003Health Affairs, 2004
- An Empty Toolbox? Changes in Health Plans’ Approaches for Managing Costs and CareHealth Services Research, 2003
- The End of an Era: What Became of the “Managed Care Revolution” in 2001?Health Services Research, 2003
- A Longitudinal Perspective On Health Plan–Provider Risk ContractingHealth Affairs, 2002
- How do doctors behave when some (but not all) of their patients are in managed care?Journal of Health Economics, 2002
- National Quality Monitoring of Medicare Health PlansMedical Care, 2001
- Economies of Scale in Physician PracticeMedical Care Research and Review, 1996
- Partnerships as Insurance Devices: Theory and EvidenceThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1995