Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Research
- Vol. 67 (3) , 160-173
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0117-2
Abstract
The present experiments aimed at separating the impact stimulus and response predictions have on serial learning and performance in SRT tasks. In Experiment 1, a unique transition between two of four responses in an otherwise random response sequence was triggered by ambiguous stimulus transitions, allowing local response predictions but no stimulus predictions. The data indicated explicit transition knowledge and strong performance benefits. In Experiments 2 and 3, unique transitions between two of four stimuli in otherwise random stimulus sequences allowed local stimulus predictions under conditions of ambiguous response transitions. The data indicated fragmentary explicit transition knowledge but no performance effects. Experiments 4a and 4b reveal that the inefficacy of the unique stimulus transitions in Experiments 2 and 3 was presumably due to the fact that the stimuli differed with respect to conjunctions of response relevant and response irrelevant features which participants did not have to attend. However, although in Experiments 4a and 4b unique transitions between response relevant stimuli were applied, substantial explicit transition knowledge but only marginal performance effects resulted. It is argued i) that in SRT tasks learning mechanisms are addressed that primarily strive for reliable predictions of forthcoming responses and ii) that for these mechanisms to work the predictors have to be attended. Response transitions are easily learned and used because both criteria are fulfilled. In contrast, pure stimulus transitions are learned only if the predictive stimuli are attended, and learned stimulus transitions become effective only to the extent that the predicted stimuli specify the required responses.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001
- Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locationsMemory & Cognition, 2000
- Hidden covariation detection: A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1997
- [Stimulus and reaction patterns in serial choice reactions].1996
- Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996
- Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal HumansJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1995
- Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learningMemory & Cognition, 1994
- Serial pattern learning by event observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1992
- On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1989
- Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1980