Internal Fixation Versus Endoprosthesis in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly:A Prospective Analysis of the Comparative Costs and the Consumption of Hospital Resources
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Orthopaedica
- Vol. 51 (1-6) , 827-831
- https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678008990880
Abstract
The consumption of hospital resources and the costs involved in treating femoral neck fractures in the elderly were studied and a comparison was made between internal fixation (von Bahr screws) and primary prosthetic replacement (Christiansen''s endoprosthesis). The 1 yr results of screw fixation were excellent or good in 55% of the patients, fair in 17% and poor in 28%, compared to 79% excellent or good results, 13% fair and 8% poor results in the prosthetic group. As regards the initial stay in hospital, prosthetic replacement was associated with 2.4 times higher costs. This difference was reduced by a more expensive follow-up and more frequent readmissions and reoperations in the internal fixation group. Considering the total costs, prosthetic replacement was 1.6 times more expensive than internal fixation.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Replacement with the Christiansen Endoprosthesis in Acute Femoral Neck Fractures:A 5 Year Follow-up StudyActa Orthopaedica, 1980
- Internal fixation of fractures of the neck of the femur using von Bahr screws and allowing immediate weight bearing: a prospective clinical studyInjury, 1979
- Internal fixation versus primary prosthetic replacement in acute femoral neck fractures: A prospective, randomized clinical studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- Nailing versus prosthesis for femoral-neck fractures. A critical review of long-term results in two hundred and thirty-nine consecutive private patientsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1975
- Primary prosthetic replacement in acute femoral neck fracturesInjury, 1975
- Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures Emphasizing Long Term Follow-up Observations on Aseptic NecrosisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1973