HIV prevention cost-effectiveness: a systematic review
Open Access
- 18 November 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 9 (S1) , S5
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-s1-s5
Abstract
Background: After more than 25 years, public health programs have not been able to sufficiently reduce the number of new HIV infections. Over 7,000 people become infected with HIV every day. Lack of convincing evidence of cost-effectiveness (CE) may be one of the reasons why implementation of effective programs is not occurring at sufficient scale. This paper identifies, summarizes and critiques the CE literature related to HIV-prevention interventions in low- and middle-income countries during 2005-2008. Methods: Systematic identification of publications was conducted through several methods: electronic databases, internet search of international organizations and major funding/implementing agencies, and journal browsing. Inclusion criteria included: HIV prevention intervention, year for publication (2005-2008), setting (low- and middle-income countries), and CE estimation (empirical or modeling) using outcomes in terms of cost per HIV infection averted and/or cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) or quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Results: We found 21 distinct studies analyzing the CE of HIV-prevention interventions published in the past four years (2005-2008). Seventeen CE studies analyzed biomedical interventions; only a few dealt with behavioral and environmental/structural interventions. Sixteen studies focused on sub-Saharan Africa, and only a handful on Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe. Many HIV-prevention interventions are very cost effective in absolute terms (using costs per DALY averted), and also in country-specific relative terms (in cost per DALY measured as percentage of GDP per capita). Conclusion: There are several types of interventions for which CE studies are still not available or insufficient, including surveillance, abstinence, school-based education, universal precautions, prevention for positives and most structural interventions. The sparse CE evidence available is not easily comparable; thus, not very useful for decision making. More than 25 years into the AIDS epidemic and billions of dollars of spending later, there is still much work to be done both on costs and effectiveness to adequately inform HIV prevention planning.Keywords
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- Low effectiveness of syndromic treatment services for curable sexually transmitted infections in rural South AfricaSexually Transmitted Infections, 2008
- Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work betterThe Lancet, 2008
- Reassessing HIV PreventionScience, 2008
- Treating Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections to Prevent HIV in AfricaJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2008
- Conditional Cash Transfers for Improving Uptake of Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income CountriesJAMA, 2007
- Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of the HIV intervention programme amongst commercial sex workers in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, IndiaBMC Public Health, 2007
- Diaphragm and lubricant gel for prevention of HIV acquisition in southern African women: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2007
- HIV prevention costs and program scale: data from the PANCEA project in five low and middle-income countriesBMC Health Services Research, 2007
- A cost function for HIV prevention services: is there a 'u' – shape?Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 2007
- Perspectives on the basic reproductive ratioJournal of The Royal Society Interface, 2005