The Effect of Risk and Autonomy on Independent Hog Producers' Contracting Decisions
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
- Vol. 30 (1) , 175-188
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1074070800008154
Abstract
The introduction of vertical coordination in the hog industry has provided producers with new business arrangements for raising hogs. While some researchers have elicited utility functions for hog producers on the basis of income risk, none have addressed autonomy, a factor which appears to be important in business arrangement selection for independent family hog operations. In this study, a method is developed for eliciting a multi-attribute function with attributes of income and autonomy. Utility functions are elicited for a group of Minnesota farrow-to-finish hog producers. For these producers, autonomy dominated risk as the most important attribute in business arrangement selection.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contracting and Vertical Coordination in the United States Pork IndustryAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995
- Emerging Business Organizations in a Rapidly Changing Pork IndustryAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995
- Multiattribute Assessment of Alternative Cropping SystemsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1995
- Risk Preferences of Dairy and Hog Producer in QuebecCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 1995
- Expo‐Power Utility: A ‘Flexible’ Form for Absolute and Relative Risk AversionAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1993
- Farmers' Goals: Uni‐ or Multi‐Dimensional?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1983
- "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence AxiomEconometrica, 1982
- Exceptional Paper—Probability Encoding in Decision AnalysisManagement Science, 1975
- Utility Analysis in a Practical SettingAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1968
- Risk Aversion in the Small and in the LargeEconometrica, 1964