Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 85 (4) , 1239-1260
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1963944
Abstract
I seek to reinvigorate the study of politicians' roles by showing how motivational role theory can be used to examine the impact of goals and incentives upon behavior and thereby integrate economic and sociological perspectives. I address three reasons for the recent neglect of politicians' roles—changes in interdisciplinary tastes, conceptual and theoretical muddles, and failures to demonstrate consequences for behavior—and find them unconvincing. I further argue that the most promising framework for the new institutionalism is one that incorporates not just formal but also informal institutional structures (like roles and norms), a framework that incorporates, rather than excludes, political behavior.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constituency Service among Sub-National Legislators in Australia and CanadaLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1988
- New Roles for Postwar British Politics: Ideologues, Generalists, Specialists, and the Progress of Professionalization in ParliamentComparative Politics, 1987
- The limitations of “structural” theories of commercial policyInternational Organization, 1986
- Purposive Behavior in the U. S. Congress: A Review EssayLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1983
- Role Orientations toward Subconstituencies: State Legislators & Local OfficialsPolity, 1982
- A Reconceptualization of Representational Role TheoryLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1979
- Representing the Celtic Fringe: Devolution and Legislative Behavior in Scotland and WalesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1978
- The House Committee on Ways and Means: Conflict Management in a Congressional CommitteeAmerican Political Science Review, 1965
- Bringing Men Back InAmerican Sociological Review, 1964
- The Problem of the Concept of Role--A Re-Survey of the LiteratureSocial Forces, 1951