THE GENDER OF SOCIAL CAPITAL
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Rationality and Society
- Vol. 10 (1) , 5-46
- https://doi.org/10.1177/104346398010001001
Abstract
Legitimacy affects returns to social capital. I begin with the network structure of social capital, explaining the information and control benefits of structural holes. The holes in a network are enterpreneurial opportunities to add value, and persons rich in such opportunities are expected to be more successful than their peers. Accumulating empirical research supports the prediction. However, women here pose a puzzle. The entrepreneurial networks linked to early promotion for senior men do not work for women. Solving the gender puzzle is an occasion to see how network models of social capital can be used to identify people not accepted as legitimate members of a population, and to describe how such people get access to social capital by borrowing the network of a strategic partner.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Contingent Value of Social CapitalAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1997
- Social Structure and the Phenomenology of AttainmentAnnual Review of Sociology, 1995
- Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational TeamsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1992
- The Stability of American MarketsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1988
- The Structure of Opportunity: How Promotion Ladders Vary Within and Among OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1986
- Social resources and socioeconomic statusSocial Networks, 1986
- Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical DiscriminationAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1986
- MEN'S AND WOMEN'S NETWORKS: A STUDY OF INTERACTION PATTERNS AND INFLUENCE IN AN ORGANIZATION.The Academy of Management Journal, 1985
- Autonomy in a Social TopologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1980
- Information Flow in Research and Development LaboratoriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1969