Healthcare rationing---are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?
- 27 November 1999
- Vol. 319 (7222) , 1426-1429
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1426
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consulting about priorities for the NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre: how good is the nominal group techniqueAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 1997
- Rationing in general practice: The Asbury draft policy on ethical use of resourcesBMJ, 1996
- Users' guides to the Medical Literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. B. what are the recommendations and will they help you in caring for your patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Political LiberalismHarvard Law Review, 1994
- Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluationsPublished by Elsevier ,1993
- Lay Participation in Health Care Decision Making: A Conceptual FrameworkJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1993
- Dimensions of rationing: who should do what?BMJ, 1993
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Designing a practice policy. Standards, guidelines, and optionsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit approachPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990