Comparison of oral and inhaled metaproterenol for prevention of exercise‐induced asthma
- 1 November 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Experimental Allergy
- Vol. 11 (6) , 597-604
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1981.tb02180.x
Abstract
The effectiveness of inhaled vs. oral metaproterenol in preventing exercise-induced asthma (EIA) was studied. Inhaled metaproterenol given 10 min before the exercise significantly reduced the degree of EIA in 24 patients, and in 75% of them completely prevented it. The mean percentage decrease in FEV1 [forced expiratory vol in 1s] was 6.5% with the inhaler and 30.1% with placebo. When inhaled 1 h before the exercise, metaproterenol was still better than placebo but its effectiveness was considerably lower. Metaproterenol tablets had a slight protective effect given 1 h before, and none when administered 2 h before exercise. There was no correlation between the protective effect against EIA and the bronchodilating effect obtained before exercise. Metaproterenol administered by metered-dose inhaler is a very effective prophylactic medication against clincially troublesome EIA, while metaproterenol tablets should not be recommended for this purpose.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral and Inhaled Salbutamol in the Prevention of Exercise-Induced BronchospasmPediatrics, 1980
- Do sympathomimetic amines prevent exercise-induced asthma by bronchodilatation alone?Respiratory Medicine, 1977
- A standardized method of evaluating exercise-induced asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1976
- Inhibition of exercise-induced asthma by different pharmacological pathways.Thorax, 1976
- INHALED AND ORAL SALBUTAMOL IN EXERCISE-INDUCED ASTHMAPublished by Elsevier ,1976
- Standardization of Exercise Tests in Asthmatic ChildrenArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1972
- The veterans administration-army cooperative study of pulmonary functionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1961