Preference for dissonant information.

Abstract
Ss heard a tape-recorded interview which was designed to make the interviewee sound either very well qualified for an international conference or very poorly qualified. Ss rated the interviewee and were then given a choice of reading an evaluation of him that agreed with their rating or one that disagreed with it. Of 18 Ss, 17 chose the evaluation that disagreed with their rating. A number of possible explanations of this result are offered, and supplementary data are presented to support them. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: