Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its receptor in colorectal cancer: Independent prognostic factors of metastasis and cancer-specific survival and potential therapeutic targets
- 20 September 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 89 (5) , 431-439
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0215(20000920)89:5<431::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-v
Abstract
Urokinase‐type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR), plasminogen (Plg), and plasminogen activator inhibitors‐1 and ‐2 (PAI‐1 and PAI‐2) have been observed in many cancers and may contribute to progression and metastasis. In our study, we examined the expression of the 5 proteins by immunohistochemistry in 59 consecutive primary colorectal cancers (CRC) and correlated the protein expression with patient outcome. In addition, we determined the effect of down‐regulation of uPAR on the invasive/metastatic capability of CRC cells, by measuring antisense‐uPAR transfected HCT116 and control cell lines, in terms of uPAR expression, uPA‐binding activity, invasiveness through Matrigel in vitro and metastasis after cecal orthotopic implantation in nude mice in vivo. We found that higher expression of uPA or uPAR in primary tumor tissues was positively correlated with distant metastasis of CRC (Mann‐Whitney, p < 0.02) and negatively correlated with both patient overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS; Cox model, p < 0.04). The prognostic value of uPA and uPAR for both OS and CSS was independent of other variables (multivariate Cox model, p < 0.007). Antisense‐uPAR transfected HCT116 cells, which expressed significantly lower levels of total cellular and cell surface uPAR proteins and uPA‐binding activity compared with either wild‐type or cells transfected with vector alone (Bonferroni, p < 0.05/3), consistently showed decreased invasiveness through Matrigel (Bonferroni, p < 0.05/3) and decreased metastasis formation in nude mice (Fisher, p < 0.05). Our data suggest that uPAR and uPA are independent prognostic factors in CRC; anti‐uPAR treatment, which affects both uPAR and uPA levels, may have potential for new treatment of the disease. Int. J. Cancer 89:431–439, 2000.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adenovirus-mediated delivery of a uPA/uPAR antagonist suppresses angiogenesis-dependent tumor growth and dissemination in miceGene Therapy, 1998
- Reduced metastasis of Polyoma virus middle T antigen-induced mammary cancer in plasminogen-deficient miceOncogene, 1998
- Management strategies for colorectal liver metastases — Part ISurgical Oncology, 1997
- In vitro inhibition of human glioblastoma cell line invasiveness by antisense uPA receptorOncogene, 1997
- Overexpression of urokinase receptor in breast cancer cells results in increased tumor invasion, growth and metastasisInternational Journal of Cancer, 1996
- Urokinase plasminogen activator and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in breast cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Association of Immunohistochemical Detection of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator with Metastasis and Prognosis in Colorectal CancerOncology, 1995
- Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and outcome in Dukes' B colorectal cancerThe Lancet, 1994
- Elevation of Tear Fluid Plasmin Activity of Contact Lens Wearers Studied with a Rapid Fluorometric AssayCornea, 1994
- Survival in patients with large-bowel cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1990