Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 Years: Police Power and Civil Liberties in Tension
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 95 (4) , 576-581
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2004.055152
Abstract
A century ago, the US Supreme Court in Jacobson v Massachusetts upheld the exercise of the police power to protect the public’s health. Despite intervening scientific and legal advances, public health practitioners still struggle with Jacobson’s basic tension between individual liberty and the common good. In affirming Massachusetts’ compulsory vaccination law, the Court established a floor of constitutional protections that consists of 4 standards: necessity, reasonable means, proportionality, and harm avoidance. Under Jacobson, the courts are to support public health matters insofar as these standards are respected. If the Court today were to decide Jacobson once again, the analysis would likely differ—to account for developments in constitutional law—but the outcome would certainly reaffirm the basic power of government to safeguard the public’s health.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vanishing vaccinations: why are so many Americans opting out of vaccinating their children?2004
- ‘Clustering of exemptions’ as a collective action threat to herd immunityVaccine, 2002
- The Last Smallpox Epidemic in Boston and the Vaccination Controversy, 1901–1903New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- From Slaughter-House to Lochner: The Rise and Fall of the Constitutionalization of Public HealthAmerican Journal of Legal History, 1996
- Lochner's LegacyColumbia Law Review, 1987