The Impact of Social Influences in the Context of Attitude, Self‐Efficacy, Intention, and Previous Behavior as Predictors of Smoking Onset1
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 25 (3) , 237-257
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01593.x
Abstract
Three different constructs for measuring social influence were utilized in the present study to explain adolescents' present and future smoking behavior at 6 (T2), 12 (T3), and 18 months (T4) after the first test. Social influence was assessed by measuring the social norms, perceived smoking behavior, and direct pressure. The impact of the social influence constructs was also assessed in the context of broader models, including attitudes and self‐efficacy expectations, intention, and previous behavior. The three social influence measures correlated significantly with intention and behavior. Stepwise regression analyses showed that perceived behavior and pressure made significant contributions, after entering social norms, in explaining actual and future adolescent smoking behavior. Adding attitudes and self‐efficacy increased the predictive power of the model significantly. In agreement with the theory of Fishbein & Ajzen (1975), intention was the most powerful predictor in explaining present and future smoking behavior. Attitudes, self‐efficacy, and the social influences also made small unique contributions improving the explanatory power by approximately 5%. Previous behavior, however, had a substantial unique contribution in predicting future behavior after attitudes, social influences, self‐efficacy, and intention were entered in the equations. Since social influences may exert their impact via different routes, it is recommended that smoking prevention programs discuss not only overt pressures such as direct pressure from peers, parents, and media, but also address the more covert social pressures such as modeling and the adolescents' ability to cope with these covert influences. Furthermore, norms on nonsmoking should be made explicit.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Dutch social influence smoking prevention approach for vocational school studentsHealth Education Research, 1994
- Self-Efficacy as an Important Determinant of Quitting Among Pregnant Women Who Smoke: The ø-PatternPreventive Medicine, 1994
- The Utilization of Qualitative and Quantitative Data for Health Education Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation: A Spiral ApproachHealth Education Quarterly, 1992
- The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Planned health education and the role of self-efficacy: Dutch researchHealth Education Research, 1991
- An investigation into the role of intentions as mediators of the attitude-behavior relationshipJournal of Economic Psychology, 1989
- Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentionsHealth Education Research, 1988
- From determinants of smoking behaviour to the implications for a prevention programmeHealth Education Research, 1986
- Assessing Gender Differences in College Cigarette Smoking Intenders and NonintendersJournal of School Health, 1983
- Emotional Conservatism: The Basis of Social Behavior?Contemporary Psychology, 1980