Pitfalls in HIV testing
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Postgraduate Medicine
- Vol. 98 (5) , 177-189
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1995.11946078
Abstract
Inaccurate results on HIV tests are rare, but they do occur. Therefore, it is important that primary care physicians understand the laboratory techniques involved. Which assays are used for detection of the virus? How are results of such tests interpreted? What factors cause false-positive and falsenegative results? Drs Cordes and Ryan answer these questions and clarify the uncertainty surrounding HIV testing.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Apparent HIV-1 glycoprotein reactivity on Western blot in uninfected blood donorsAIDS, 1993
- False Positive Tests for HIV in a Woman with Lupus and Renal FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- False-Positive ELISA for Human Immunodeficiency Virus after Influenza VaccinationThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1993
- The Immunopathogenesis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Multiple false-positive serologic tests for HIV, HTLV-1, and hepatitis C following influenza vaccination, 1991Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Diagnosis of Infection with the Human Immunodeficiency VirusClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- WEARING GLOVES AS CAUSE OF FALSE-NEGATIVE HIV TESTSThe Lancet, 1988
- Measurement of the False Positive Rate in a Screening Program for Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- PASSIVE IMMUNONEUTRALISATION OF HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED AIDSThe Lancet, 1988
- Follow‐up testing and notification of anti‐HIV Western blot atypical (indeterminant) donorsTransfusion, 1988