LSimpute: accurate estimation of missing values in microarray data with least squares methods
Open Access
- 13 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 32 (3) , 34e-34
- https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gnh026
Abstract
Microarray experiments generate data sets with information on the expression levels of thousands of genes in a set of biological samples. Unfortun ately, such experiments often produce multiple missing expression values, normally due to various experimental problems. As many algorithms for gene expression analysis require a complete data matrix as input, the missing values have to be estimated in order to analyze the available data. Alternatively, genes and arrays can be removed until no missing values remain. However, for genes or arrays with only a small number of missing values, it is desirable to impute those values. For the subsequent analysis to be as informative as possible, it is essential that the estimates for the missing gene expression values are accurate. A small amount of badly estimated missing values in the data might be enough for clustering methods, such as hierachical clustering or K‐means clustering, to produce misleading results. Thus, accurate methods for missing value estimation are needed. We present novel methods for estimation of missing values in microarray data sets that are based on the least squares principle, and that utilize correlations between both genes and arrays. For this set of methods, we use the common reference name LSimpute. We compare the estimation accuracy of our methods with the widely used KNNimpute on three complete data matrices from public data sets by randomly knocking out data (labeling as missing). From these tests, we conclude that our LSimpute methods produce estimates that consistently are more accurate than those obtained using KNNimpute. Additionally, we examine a more classic approach to missing value estimation based on expectation maximization (EM). We refer to our EM implementations as EMimpute, and the estimate errors using the EMimpute methods are compared with those our novel methods produce. The results indicate that on average, the estimates from our best performing LSimpute method are at least as accurate as those from the best EMimpute algorithm.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Judging the Quality of Gene Expression-Based Clustering Methods Using Gene AnnotationGenome Research, 2002
- A gene-expression program reflecting the innate immune response of cultured intestinal epithelial cells to infection by Listeria monocytogenesGenome Biology, 2002
- Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarraysBioinformatics, 2001
- Genomic Expression Programs in the Response of Yeast Cells to Environmental ChangesMolecular Biology of the Cell, 2000
- Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing and modelingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
- Gene expression data analysisFEBS Letters, 2000
- Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profilingNature, 2000
- Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression MonitoringScience, 1999
- Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arraysProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999
- Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patternsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1998