Renal Scintigraphy versus Renal Vein Renin Activity for Identifying and Treating Renovascular Hypertension

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper compares renal scintigraphy (RS) with renal vein renin activity (RVRA), intravenous pyelography (IVP), and peripheral plasma renin activity (pPRA) in a population of hypertensive subjects with suspect renovascular hypertension (RVH), of whom 30 underwent surgery, in order to evaluate (a) screening ability of RS for RVH, and (b) surgical prognosis of RS for RVH. RS agreed with arteriographic findings of arterial stenosis in 91% of patients and proved more sensitive as a screening test than IVP and pPRA. The false-negative rate of RS was 9% and the false-positive rate was 10%. In the patients who underwent surgery RS was positive in 89% and RVRA in 85% of those who benefited from surgery. In this series false-negatives for RS occurred only in the presence of extensive collateral circulation, where RVRA also gave the same result. In patients who had been operated on, the sensitivity and specificity of RS, compared to RVRA, were very high. Our work supports the view that RS is a good screening test in RVH; moreover, it seems to be as accurate as RVRA as a surgical prognostic method for curable RVH.