The rise and fall of the ten-day rule
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 59 (697) , 3-6
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-59-697-3
Abstract
The introduction of the 10-day rule is described together with the difficulties arising from its application. The reasons for believing it is now unnecessary are summarised. The new recommendations from the National Radiological Protection Board stress the importance of identifying a pregnancy after a period has been missed and provide advice regarding the radiography of the patients. The rationale of these suggestions is given. The importance is stressed of keeping both male and female gonad doses to a minimum during the reproductive years.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost and effectiveness of methods of radiation protection in X-ray diagnosisClinical Radiology, 1985
- In uteroexposure to A-bomb radiation and mental retardation; a reassessmentThe British Journal of Radiology, 1984
- How dangerous are diagnostic X-rays?Clinical Radiology, 1984
- An overall genetic risk assessment for radiological protection purposes.Journal of Medical Genetics, 1980
- Radiation effects on pre-natal development and their radiological significanceThe British Journal of Radiology, 1979
- A report of a working party of the M.R.C. Isotope Advisory PanelThe British Journal of Radiology, 1977
- Radiation Hazards to the Embryo and FetusRadiology, 1952