Searching for a Break in GNP
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Vol. 10 (3) , 237-250
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509903
Abstract
It has been suggested that existing estimates of the long-run impact of a surprise move in income may have a substantial upward bias due to the presence of a trend break in postwar U.S. gross national product data. This article shows that the statistical evidence does not warrant abandoning the no-trend-break null hypothesis. A key part of the argument is that conventionally computed p values overstate the likelihood of the trend-break alternative hypothesis. This is because they do not take into account that, in practice, the date is chosen based on pretest examination of the data.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Life-cycle models of consumption: Is the evidence consistent with the theory?Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2008
- Recursive and Sequential Tests of the Unit-Root and Trend-Break Hypotheses: Theory and International EvidenceJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1992
- Permanent and Transitory Movements in Labor Income: An Explanation for "Excess Smoothness" in ConsumptionJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- Unit roots in real GNP: Do we know, and do we care?Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1990
- The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root HypothesisEconometrica, 1989
- Are Output Fluctuations Transitory?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987
- Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom InflationEconometrica, 1982
- Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time seriesJournal of Monetary Economics, 1982
- A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient VariationEconometrica, 1979
- TESTING FOR AUTOCORRELATION IN DYNAMIC LINEAR MODELS*Australian Economic Papers, 1978