Should Insurance Coverage for in Vitro Fertilization Be Mandated?
- 29 August 2002
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 347 (9) , 686-688
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejme020087
Abstract
Not long ago, in vitro fertilization was the stuff of science fiction.1 Even after the birth of the first baby from in vitro fertilization in 1978, such births were initially few and far between, and there was skepticism about the future of in vitro fertilization as a mainstream medical procedure. Insurance companies considered it experimental and therefore not eligible for coverage in benefit plans. Twenty years later, data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from in vitro fertilization clinics in the United States2 indicated that more than 58,000 in vitro fertilization cycles were performed annually, resulting in . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Insurance Coverage and Outcomes of in Vitro FertilizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Blastocyst culture and transfer: a step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcomeFertility and Sterility, 2002
- Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology RegistryFertility and Sterility, 2002
- Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1997. Results generated from European registers by ESHREHuman Reproduction, 2001
- Improvement in outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction with increased experienceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
- Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilizationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- The Willingness to Pay for In Vitro Fertilization: A Pilot Study Using Contingent ValuationMedical Care, 1994