Illuminating Negative Results in Evaluation of Smoking Prevention Programs
- 1 November 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of School Health
- Vol. 60 (9) , 448-451
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1990.tb05973.x
Abstract
Evaluation of program implementation can help illuminate negative results of school-based smoking prevention programs. In three conventional quasiexperimental evaluations, no statistically significant impacts of smoking prevention programs on children's knowledge, attitudes, intentions, or behavior were detected. Complementary evaluations of program implementation along several dimensions using naturalistic methods suggested reasons for null effects were different at each site. These data were used to form hypotheses and recommendations for future interventions.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Avoiding type III error in program evaluation: Results from a field experimentPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Preventing Cigarette Smoking Among School ChildrenAnnual Review of Public Health, 1988
- Reliability and Validity in Qualitative ResearchPublished by SAGE Publications ,1986
- Avoiding Type III Errors in Health Education Program Evaluations: A Case StudyHealth Education Quarterly, 1985
- Are social-psychological smoking prevention programs effective? The waterloo studyJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1985
- Naturalistic inquiryInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985
- Measuring the Degree of Program ImplementationEvaluation Review, 1983
- Research on implementation: Implications for evaluation practice and evaluation policyEvaluation and Program Planning, 1982
- Qualitative Methods for Evaluative Research in Health Education ProgramsHealth Education, 1982
- Evaluating Program ImplementationEvaluation Review, 1980