Revision of the Zone 13 graptolite biostratigraphy in the Marathon, Texas, standard succession and its bearing on Upper Ordovician graptolite biogeography
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- Published by Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS in Lethaia
- Vol. 28 (2) , 115-128
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1995.tb01601.x
Abstract
One of the long‐standing problems in North American graptolite biostratigraphy is the distinct differences in assemblages of post‐Climacograptus bicornis age between the classical graptolite sequences in the New York ‐ Quebec and Marathon, west Texas, regions. These have been attributed either to faunal provincialism or to the presence of a major hiatus between the Woods Hollow and Maravillas formations in Texas. New collections from the key Marathon Picnic Grounds section contain diagnostic Late Ordovician graptolites that confirm the existence of a major stratigraphic gap below the Maravillas Formation. The lower Maravillas Formation (Zone 13) has a Late Ordovician, low‐diversity Pacific Province graptolite fauna that includes the biostratigraphically diagnostic species Climacograptus nevadensis, C. tubuliferus, Orthograptus fastigatus and Dicellograptus ornatus. Zone 13 graptolite assemblages from the Marathon region correlate with the C. tubuliferus to D. ornatus zones in the Trail Creek, Idaho, succession, the Ea4‐Bo2 interval in Victoria, the O. fastigatus Zone in the Canadian Arctic Islands, the O. quadrimucronatus to D. ornatus zones of the Canadian Cordillera, and the D. complanatus to D. anceps zones in Scotland. The hiatus between the Woods Hollow and Maravillas formations spans an interval corresponding to at least the Eal Ea3 interval in Australia, the C. americanus to upper A. manitoulinensis zones in the New York ‐ Quebec succession, and the D. clingani and P. linearis zones in Scotland. These results agree with the magnitude of the hiatus previously indicated by conodont biostratigraphy. Late Ordovician graptolite distribution patterns in North America can be explained by an extension of Cooper, Fortey & Lindholm's (1991; Lethaia 24) Lower Ordovician graptolite biofacies model into the Upper Ordovician, which incorporates both lateral water‐mass specificity and depth stratification. Using this model, we recognize in Laurentia two separate biofacies among tropical‐zone Late Ordovician Pacific Province graptolite faunas, a cosmopolitan Oceanic biofacies, and a cratonic Laurentian biofacies. The lower Maravillas Formation graptolite fauna is clearly part of the Oceanic biofacies, whereas the coeval Appalachian faunas represent the Laurentian biofacies. □Graptolites, Ordovician, biostratigraphy, Texas, biofacies, biogeography.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Ordovician graptolite sequence of AustralasiaAlcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 1992
- Latitudinal and depth zonation of early Ordovician graptolitesLethaia, 1991
- Upper Ordovician graptolites from the D. complanatus Zone of the Moffat and Girvan districts and their significance for correlationScottish Journal of Geology, 1987
- The graptolite correlation of the North American Upper Ordovician StandardLethaia, 1986
- Biostratigraphic integration of Ordovician graptolite and conodont zones—a regional reviewGeological Society, London, Special Publications, 1986
- Middle to Upper Ordovician graptolite biostratigraphy of Peel River and other areas of the northern Canadian CordilleraCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1985
- Upper Ordovician graptolites from the top Lower Hartfell Shale Formation (D. clinganiandP. lineariszones) near Moffat, southern ScotlandEarth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1982
- Review of late middle Ordovician graptolites in eastern New York and PennsylvaniaAmerican Journal of Science, 1970
- On the 'Snake Hill Shale'American Journal of Science, 1963
- Health of New YorkScientific American, 1847