Prognostic Factors and Treatment Modalities in Uterine Sarcoma
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 25 (3) , 256-260
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-200206000-00010
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify the impact of various prognostic factors in the management of uterine sarcoma. Fifty-nine patients with uterine sarcoma were treated at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center between 1980 and 1997. Forty-three patients (73%) were treated by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 7 (12%) total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with sampling of pelvic lymph nodes, and 9 (15%) had biopsy only. Nine patients received adjuvant treatment; five had radiation therapy (XRT), two had chemotherapy, one had combined XRT and chemotherapy, and one received hormonal treatment. Leiomyosarcoma cases accounted for 42% of all the uterine sarcomas, carcinosarcoma cases for 34%, and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) for 24%. Fifty (85%) patients had pathologic grade II and III tumor, with only 9 patients grade I. Twenty-seven patients (46%) were classified surgically as stage I, 7 (12%) as stage II, 17 (29%) as stage III, and 8 (13%) had stage IV tumor. Recurrences developed in 34 patients (71%). The 5- and 10-year overall actuarial survival for all patients was 42%, and the corresponding relapse-free survivals for those who achieved complete response after primary treatment (48 patients) were 27% and 20%. On the univariate analysis, grade I tumors (p = 0.04), ESS (p = 0.02), nonmetastatic stage (p = 0.05), and negative peritoneal cytology (p = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival. Factors associatedKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uterine Sarcomas: The Curie Institut Experience. Prognosis Factors and Adjuvant TreatmentsGynecologic Oncology, 1999
- Uterine sarcomas in Norway 1956–1992: Incidence, survival and mortalityEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- The Prognostic Significance of Surgery, Tumor Size, Malignancy Grade, Menopausal Status, and DNA Ploidy in Endometrial Stromal SarcomaGynecologic Oncology, 1996
- A Multivariate Analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors for Predicting Outcome in Uterine SarcomasGynecologic Oncology, 1994
- Uterine sarcomas: a review of the Edinburgh experience from 1974 to 1992The British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Survival, patterns of spread and prognostic factors in uterine sarcoma: a study of 76 patientsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Prognostic factors in early‐stage uterine sarcoma: A gynecologic oncology group studyCancer, 1993
- Leiomyosarcomas have a poorer prognosis than mixed mesodermal tumours when adjusting for known prognostic factors: the result of a retrospective study of 423 cases of uterine sarcomaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Retrospective analysis of 318 cases of uterine sarcomaEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Uterine sarcomas: Prognostic factors and treatment modalities—Study on 209 patientsGynecologic Oncology, 1986