Effects of warning signals and fixation point offsets on the latencies of pro- versus antisaccades: implications for an interpretation of the gap effect
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Experimental Brain Research
- Vol. 103 (2) , 287-293
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00231715
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- What are human express saccades?Perception & Psychophysics, 1993
- Viewing behavior: Ocular and attentional disengagementPerception & Psychophysics, 1993
- Separate populations of visually guided saccades in humans: reaction times and amplitudesExperimental Brain Research, 1993
- Characteristics of ?anti? saccades in manExperimental Brain Research, 1992
- Role of the rostral superior colliculus in active visual fixation and execution of express saccadesJournal of Neurophysiology, 1992
- Express saccades: is there a separate population in humans?Experimental Brain Research, 1991
- The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkeyJournal of Neurophysiology, 1987
- Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movementsNeuropsychologia, 1987
- The effect of attentive fixation on eye movements evoked by electrical stimulation of the frontal eye fieldsExperimental Brain Research, 1986
- Effects of Components of Displacement-Step Stimuli Upon Latency for Saccadic Eye MovementJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1967