Ambient Gas Concentrations and Personal Particulate Matter Exposures
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Epidemiology
- Vol. 16 (3) , 385-395
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000155505.04775.33
Abstract
Data from a previous study conducted in Baltimore, MD, showed that ambient fine particulate matter less than 2.5 mum in diameter (PM2.5) concentrations were strongly correlated with corresponding personal PM2.5 exposures, whereas ambient O3, NO2, and SO2 concentrations were weakly correlated with their personal exposures to these gases. In contrast, many of the ambient gas concentrations were reasonable surrogates of personal PM2.5 exposures. Personal multipollutant exposures and corresponding ambient air pollution concentrations were measured for 43 subjects living in Boston, MA. The cohort consisted of 20 healthy senior citizens and 23 schoolchildren. Simultaneous 24-hour integrated PM2.5, O3, NO2, and SO2 personal exposures and ambient concentrations were measured. All PM2.5 samples were also analyzed for SO4 (sulfate). We analyzed personal exposure and ambient concentration data using correlation and mixed model regression analyses to examine relationships among (1) ambient PM2.5 concentrations and corresponding ambient gas concentrations; (2) ambient PM2.5 and gas concentrations and their respective personal exposures; (3) ambient gas concentrations and corresponding personal PM2.5 exposures; and (4) personal PM2.5 exposures and corresponding personal gas exposures. We found substantial correlations between ambient PM2.5 concentrations and corresponding personal exposures over the course of time. Additionally, our results support the earlier finding that summertime gaseous pollutant concentrations may be better surrogates of personal PM2.5 exposures (especially personal exposures to PM2.5 of ambient origin) than they are surrogates of personal exposures to the gases themselves. Particle health effects studies that include both ambient PM2.5 and gaseous concentrations as independent variables must be analyzed carefully and interpreted cautiously, since both parameters may be serving as surrogates for PM2.5 exposures.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Personal exposure of Paris office workers to nitrogen dioxide and fine particlesOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2002
- Gaseous pollutants in particulate matter epidemiology: confounders or surrogates?Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- Investigating regional differences in short-term effects of air pollution on daily mortality in the APHEA project: a sensitivity analysis for controlling long-term trends and seasonality.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- Development and Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Personal Multipollutant Sampler for Simultaneous Measurements of Particulate and Gaseous PollutantsAerosol Science and Technology, 2001
- Indoor, outdoor, and personal exposure monitoring of particulate air pollution: the Baltimore elderly epidemiology-exposure pilot studyAtmospheric Environment, 2000
- A simulation study of confounding in generalized linear models for air pollution epidemiology.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1999
- Effects of Particulate and Gaseous Air Pollution on Cardiorespiratory HospitalizationsArchives of environmental health, 1999
- Childhood exposure to PM10: relation between personal, classroom, and outdoor concentrations.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1997
- Ozone personal exposures and health effects for selected groups residing in the Fraser ValleyAtmospheric Environment, 1997
- INFLAMMATION AND CELL DAMAGE INDUCED BY REPEATED EXPOSURE OF HUMANS TO OZONEInhalation Toxicology, 1997