Compensatory Responses of Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) to Partial Shading
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- weed biology-and-ecology
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Science
- Vol. 41 (4) , 541-547
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500076281
Abstract
Lower leaves of greenhouse-grown common cocklebur and velvetleaf were shaded to 5% of full light over a 12-d period while upper leaves remained exposed to full light to determine weed foliar and branching responses to partial shading similar to that encountered in soybean crops. Shading increased lower leaf senescence and specific leaf area, and decreased branch length and number of second-order leaves in both species compared to unshaded controls. Common cocklebur branched more extensively along the lower portion of its stem than velvetleaf under both shaded and unshaded conditions. Upper leaves of partially shaded velvetleaf were held in a more perpendicular position to the light source beginning 3 days after treatment (DAT) compared to upper leaves of unshaded plants. Shading of lower leaves caused an increase in upper (unshaded) leaf area beginning 3 and 6 DAT in velvetleaf and common cocklebur, respectively. Petiole length of upper leaves also increased in response to shading in both species. Total plant dry weight at 12 DAT was unaffected by shading in velvetleaf but was reduced 10% by shading in common cocklebur. While common cocklebur maintained greater lower shoot growth in the presence of shade than velvetleaf, there was a greater change in upper leaf angle by velvetleaf in response to shading than by common cocklebur. These results support previous field observations of apparent greater shade tolerance of common cocklebur compared to velvetleaf and indicate that both species have the ability to compensate for shading of lower leaves by altering upper shoot growth.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Leaf Orientation of Soybean Seedlings: II. Receptor Sites and Light StimuliCrop Science, 1990
- Photonastic Control of Leaflet Orientation in Melilotus indicus (Fabaceae)Plant Physiology, 1987
- THE CONTROL OF LEAF ORIENTATION BY LIGHTPhotochemistry and Photobiology, 1986
- THE VECTORIAL PHOTO-EXCITATION IN SOLAR-TRACKING LEAVES OF Lavatera cretica (MALVACEAE)*,†Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1985
- The Solar Tracking Pattern in a Closed Alfalfa Canopy1Crop Science, 1983
- Anatomical and physiological characteristics of the petiole of Abutilon theophrasti in relation to circadian leaf movementsPhysiologia Plantarum, 1981
- The carbon gain benefits of solar tracking in a desert annualPlant, Cell & Environment, 1978
- Influence of Assimilate Demand on Photosynthesis, Diffusive Resistances, Translocation, and Carbohydrate Levels of Soybean LeavesPlant Physiology, 1974
- Effect of Shading Mature Leaves of Alfalfa and Sainfoin Plants on Specific Leaf Weight of Leaves Formed in Sunlight1Crop Science, 1972
- Environmental Influence on Specific Leaf Weight and Its Heritability in Sainfoin1Crop Science, 1972