When I Write My Masterpiece: Thoughts On What Makes A Paper Interesting
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal
- Vol. 49 (1) , 16-20
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785495
Abstract
This article reflects on academic papers and what makes them interesting. The author believes academic papers are like rock and roll bands: whether an audience finds them interesting is a matter of perspective, if not taste. Subject matter is important and he finds that several kinds pique his interest in paper. The author believes that papers in graduate classes are too often celebrated for their methods but some papers are interesting because their methods are so different from the ubiquitous secondary data sets, attitude surveys, and interviews of top managers that provide most of the grist in the field. He finds methods that get close enough to behavior to show how people wittingly or unwittingly build and maintain their social worlds of particular interest.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Taking Turns and Talking Ties: Networks and Conversational InteractionAmerican Journal of Sociology, 2005
- Scientific Management's Lost Aesthetic: Architecture, Organization, and the Taylorized Beauty of the MechanicalAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1997
- Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development FirmAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1997
- Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1994
- Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing TeamsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1993
- The Social Production of Technical WorkPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- The Population Ecology of OrganizationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977