PRACTICAL USE OF NEIGHBOR METHODS AND ALTERNATIVES IN THE ANALYSIS OF FIELD TRIALS
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Plant Science
- Vol. 67 (2) , 477-489
- https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps87-067
Abstract
Neighbor methods for the analysis of field experiments are described with the minimum of mathematical detail. Using actual field data, two popular methods are compared with standard blocking, row and column elimination, and covariance analysis. It is shown that simple randomized block analysis is likely to give biased treatment effects when there is a fertility trend. For large experiments, row and column analysis is likely to be inferior to covariance analysis using well-chosen covariates. Neighbor analysis can be more precise than standard methods based on well-designed experiments with appropriate blocking. Situations where neighbor methods may not work well are suggested, but since the methods are easy to use they are recommended when fertility trends are suspected and a simple detective tool is required.Key words: Neighbor analysis, covariate analysis, lattice design, fertility trendsThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Analysis of Field Experiments Using Neighbouring PlotsBiometrics, 1986
- The Importance of Lay-out in Determining Error Variance in Field ExperimentsExperimental Agriculture, 1985
- Working rules for determining the plot size and numbers of plots per block in field experimentsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1984
- The efficiency of incomplete block designs in National List and Recommended List cereal variety trialsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1983
- An investigation into inter‐plot interactions, in experiments with mildew on barley, using balanced designsAnnals of Applied Biology, 1979
- Block designs for variety trialsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1978
- The Use of Covariance to Control Gradients in ExperimentsPublished by JSTOR ,1954