Randomized Trial of Epidural Versus General Anesthesia

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To compare the effects of epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia on early postoperative outcomes after unilateral primary total knee replacement, 262 patients were randomly assigned to receive either epidural or general anesthesia. All patients received a common rehabilitation protocol including a standardized assessment of progress. One hundred eighty-eight patients received a common thromboembolic prophylaxis protocol with postoperative aspirin, and had a standardized surveillance protocol to detect thromboembolic complications. Deep vein thrombosis was determined by venography on the operative limb, and pulmonary embolism was determined by comparison of preoperative and postoperative lung perfusion scans. The epidural anesthesia group reached all rehabilitative milestones earlier postoperatively than did the general anesthesia group, with a statistically significant earlier attainment of stair climbing. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 40% with epidural anesthesia, and 48% with general anesthesia. There were no clots proximal to the popliteal veins. The incidence of pulmonary embolism on lung scan was 12% with epidural anesthesia and 9% with general anesthesia. Epidural anesthesia is associated with more rapid achievement of postoperative in hospital rehabilitation goals after total knee replacement. A minor reduction in postoperative deep vein thrombosis rate was observed with epidural anesthesia, but this did not reach statistical significance. No difference in early postoperative pulmonary embolism was observed between the 2 types of anesthesia.