HUMAN RODS AND CONES
- 1 December 1934
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 12 (6) , 914-930
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1934.00830190128015
Abstract
The present seems a favorable time to take stock of the knowledge, theories and impressions of the visual cells and their mode of operation. Advance in the histology of the human retina practically ceased with the publication of Greeff's classic monograph in 1900, but photochemical and photophysical theorization as to the nature of the visual process continue. So many ideas in circulation at present have their basis in real or supposed cytologic features of the visual cells that there is need for a reexamination of these features and for indications as to what still needs badly to be done, histologically, to enable one to eliminate some of these conflicting ideas and prepare one to consider the next crop. It is hoped, then, that the reader who is familiar with the principal reference books and interested in current theory will find here some aid in developing a defense against the plausible.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE VISUAL ACUITY AND INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION OF DROSOPHILAThe Journal of general physiology, 1934
- VISUAL ACUITY AND ITS PHYSIOLOGICAL BASISThe British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 1933
- PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE FORM OF NORMAL HUMAN VISUAL CELLSArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1930
- Studies on the retina. Histogenesis of the visual cells in amblystomaJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1921