The impact of initial highly active antiretroviral therapy on future treatment sequences in HIV infection
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 18 (14) , 1895-1904
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200409240-00005
Abstract
To determine whether the initial use of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) or protease inhibitors (PI) differentially influences subsequent HIV therapy. A cohort study using a prospective clinical database in a university-based HIV clinic. A total of 440 HIV-seropositive patients, naive or nucleoside experienced, initiating therapy with either an NNRTI or PI between January 1998 and July 2003 and followed to December 2003. Time until stopping the first regimen and until exposure to all antiretroviral classes (excluding tenofovir and enfuvirtide) according to the type of initial regimen. A total of 291 subjects initiated HAART with PI and 149 with NNRTI; median follow-up 3.1 and 2.3 years, respectively. Subjects starting NNRTI remained on their initial regimens longer (median time to change 2.1 versus 1.6 years; log rank P = 0.03). Overall, subjects initiating NNRTI-based regimens were less likely to alter their therapy. Previous nucleoside exposure was an important predictor of treatment modification. Subjects initiating NNRTI-based HAART were also less likely to experience virological failure than those initiating PI-based HAART. Individuals starting with NNRTI were exposed to fewer regimens (15 versus 25% received three or fewer regimens), and showed a trend towards lower rates of three-class exposure (7 versus 12%). There is a high rate of treatment modification among patients initiating HAART. The initial use of NNRTI-based HAART was associated with more durable treatment and lower rates of virological failure, which may translate into a reduced need for multiple salvage therapies.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nelfinavir, Efavirenz, or Both after the Failure of Nucleoside Treatment of HIV InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Comparison of Virologic, Immunologic, and Clinical Response to Five Different Initial Protease Inhibitor-Containing and Nevirapine-Containing RegimensJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001
- Outcome of a Second-Line Protease Inhibitor–Containing Regimen in Patients Failing or Intolerant of a First Highly Active Antiretroviral TherapyJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2000
- Efavirenz plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine, Efavirenz plus Indinavir, and Indinavir plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine in the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Incidence and Predictors of Virologic Failure of Antiretroviral Triple-Drug Therapy in a Community-Based CohortAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 1999
- Novel Four‐Drug Salvage Treatment Regimens after Failure of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor–Containing Regimen: Antiviral Activity and Correlation of Baseline Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility with Virologic OutcomeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Changing patterns of mortality across Europe in patients infected with HIV-1The Lancet, 1998
- Declining Morbidity and Mortality among Patients with Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Treatment with Indinavir, Zidovudine, and Lamivudine in Adults with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Prior Antiretroviral TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- A Controlled Trial of Two Nucleoside Analogues plus Indinavir in Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and CD4 Cell Counts of 200 per Cubic Millimeter or LessNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997