Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Arterial Disease
- 14 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 285 (10) , 1338-1345
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.10.1338
Abstract
Review from JAMA — Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Arterial Disease — A Meta-analysis — ContextMagnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a rapidly evolving technique that has been reported to be accurate for assessment of lower extremity arterial disease.ObjectiveTo obtain the best available estimates of the diagnostic performance of MRA in patients with lower extremity arterial disease.Data SourcesStudies published from January 1985 through May 2000 in English, German, or French, identified from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents databases.Study SelectionStudies were included that allowed construction of 2 × 2 contingency tables for detection of stenosis greater than 50% or occlusion with MRA or arteriography in patients with claudication or critical ischemia.Data ExtractionTwo observers graded the following elements of study quality: consecutively enrolled patients, prospective study design, clear cut-off levels, blinded assessment, and clear description of MRA technique. Summary receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to examine the influence of year of publication, all methodological criteria, arterial tract, number of subdivisions within arterial tracts, and MRA technique on diagnostic performance.Data SynthesisOf 3583 studies initially identified, 34 were included that evaluated MRA in 1090 patients (72% men; median age, 65 years). Magnetic resonance angiography was highly accurate for assessment of all lower extremity arteries. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced (3-D Gd) MRA improved diagnostic performance compared with 2-D MRA (relative diagnostic odds ratio, 2.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-6.4]), adjusted for number of subdivisions within arterial tracts. The estimated points of equal sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 90% for 3-D Gd MRA and 2-D MRA, respectively.ConclusionsMagnetic resonance angiography is highly accurate for assessment of the entire lower extremity for arterial disease. Three-dimensional Gd-enhanced MRA improves diagnostic performance compared with 2-D MRA.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Summary receiver operating characteristic curves as a technique for meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of duplex ultrasonography in peripheral arterial diseaseAcademic Radiology, 1996
- Diagnosis of arterial disease of the lower extremities with duplex ultrasonographyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Evaluation of the quality of clinical research studies of magnetic resonance angiography: 1991‐1994Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1996
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional time-of-flight sequence.Radiology, 1995
- Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Intrapelvic two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in healthy and diseased subjectsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1994
- Fast magnetic resonance angiography using turbo-FLASH sequences in advanced aortoiliac diseaseThe British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerationsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography.Radiology, 1991
- THE ESTIMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOGARITHM OF A RATIO OF FREQUENCIESAnnals of Human Genetics, 1956