Is it economically viable to employ the nurse practitioner in general practice?
- 11 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Vol. 20 (3-4) , 518-529
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03492.x
Abstract
Background: General practitioners face the challenging task of finding the most efficient and effective mix of professionals in general practice to accommodate future care demands within scarce health care budgets. To enable informed decision-making about skill mix issues, economic information is needed. - Design: Discursive paper. - Method: A descriptive and explorative design was chosen to study the economic viability of nurse practitioner employment in general practice. The conditions under which the nurse practitioner is able to earn back his/her own cost of employment were identified. Preferences and expectations of general practitioners and health insurers about nurse practitioner reimbursement were made transparent. - Results: Although general practitioners and health insurers acknowledge the importance of the nurse practitioner in accommodating primary care demands, they have polarised views about reimbursement. The employment of nurse practitioners is seldom economically viable in current practices. It requires a reallocation of (80% of) the general practitioner’s freed up time towards practice growth (12% number of patients). - Conclusion: The economic viability of the nurse practitioner has proven difficult to achieve in every day health care practice. This study provided insight into the complex interaction of the (cost) parameters that result in economic viability and feeds a further discussion about the content of the nurse practitioner role in general practice based on optimal quality of care vs. efficiency. - Relevance to clinical practice: Effective and efficient health care can only be provided if the actual care needs of a population provide the basis for deciding which mix of professionals is best equipped to deal with the changing and increasing demand of care. A macro-level intervention is needed to help a broad-scale introduction of the nurse practitioner in general practiceKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economic evaluation of nurse practitioners versus GPs in treating common conditionsBritish Journal of General Practice, 2010
- Nurse practitioners substituting for general practitioners: randomized controlled trialJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2009
- Critical appraisal of the literature on economic evaluations of substitution of skills between professionals: a systematic literature reviewJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2008
- Primary Care Outcomes in Patients treated by Nurse Practitioners or Physicians: Two-Year Follow-UpMedical Care Research and Review, 2004
- Nurse practitioners in primary careFamily Practice, 2000
- Effects on quality of care for patients with NIDDM or COPD when the specialised nurse has a central role: a literature reviewPatient Education and Counseling, 2000
- Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary careBMJ, 2000
- Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary careBMJ, 2000
- Skill mix changes: substitution or service development?Health Policy, 1998