Ethics of research with psychiatric patients: principles, problems and the primary responsibilities of researchers.
Open Access
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 19 (2) , 85-91
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.19.2.85
Abstract
In this paper some of the general issues surrounding recently published guidelines for the practice of research ethics committees are outlined, concentrating in particular on the difficulties raised by research with psychiatric patients. Research is distinguished from ordinary clinical practice by the intention to advance knowledge. So defined, research with psychiatric patients should be governed by the same four principles as research with any other group--knowledge, necessity, benefit and consent. In applying these principles, however, particularly the principle of consent, many acute difficulties are raised by psychiatric patients. A number of proposals for addressing these difficulties are discussed. It is suggested that, notwithstanding the value of published guidelines, and the help that may be available from research ethics committees, the primary responsibility for maintaining high standards of practice in research rests with research workers themselves.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Research on Readmission to a Psychiatric HospitalThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1990
- Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees.BMJ, 1989
- Sterilisation of a Mentally Incapable WomanThe Lancet, 1989
- Randomised Trials and Informed ConsentThe Lancet, 1988
- Consent, competency and ECT: a psychiatrist's viewJournal of Medical Ethics, 1983
- Consent, competency and ECT: a philosopher's comment.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1983
- Normal and Pathological GriefJAMA, 1983
- Research as an Impetus to Improved TreatmentArchives of General Psychiatry, 1980
- “Mini-mental state”Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1975