The who and why of pain: analysis by social class.
- 24 March 1984
- Vol. 288 (6421) , 883-886
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.288.6421.883
Abstract
Physicians with an interest in pain have long suggested that the poor complain more and have a higher prevalence of neuroticism than do higher social groups. This assumption was tested by analysing the pain patterns in 500 consecutive patients attending a pain relief clinic. Results implied that scores for presenting pain, anxiety, and depression were similar to all social groups. After treatment scores for residual pain were significantly lower in all social classes, with greatest reduction in classes III, IV, and V. Almost identical results were obtained in a subgroup of patients with cancer but not in a subgroup with sciatica. That patients from the lower social classes have a higher perception of pain and are more neurotic than other group is a myth, probably resulting from poor communication between clinicians and patients of dissimilar socioeconomic class.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- White-collar and blue-collar responses to heart attackJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1976
- The Influence of Social Factors on Expectations of Pain Associated with OsteoarthritisScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1975
- MEASUREMENT OF PAINPublished by Elsevier ,1974
- Patient Delay in CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973
- FACTORS PREDISPOSING TO POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND PULMONARY COMPLICATIONSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1973
- The Communication of Information about IllnessPublished by S. Karger AG ,1971
- On the Language of PainAnesthesiology, 1971
- Scores on Three Personality Variables as a Function of Age, Sex and Social ClassBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1969
- Social Status and Subjective Perceptions of 250 Men after Myocardial InfarctionPublic Health Reports (1896-1970), 1969
- Psychiatric patients with persistent painJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1965