Multimode Ligand Binding in Receptor Site Modeling: Implementation in CoMFA
- 28 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Vol. 43 (6) , 2093-2105
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ci034100a
Abstract
Receptor site modeling methods usually use one binding mode (conformation and/or orientation) for each ligand in a 1:1 complex with receptor. Multiple modes should be considered instead because (1) they have frequently been observed experimentally; (2) in a series, ligands can bind in single yet different modes; and (3) a series may only exhibit one but unknown mode and a few plausible modes must be examined. For multimode binding, the observed ligand/receptor association constant is the sum of the association constants that characterize individual binding modes. This relation, when applied to Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA), results in a dependence of the observed binding energy on the probe energies that is nonlinear in optimized parameters. The dependence was linearized to allow parameter optimization by the partial least-squares method that was used iteratively until self-consistency. In addition to the standard CoMFA output, the procedure objectively selects one or a few optimal binding modes out of a dozen or more modes that are considered for each ligand. The approach was applied to published data for binding of 34 polychlorinated dibenzofurans to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Descriptive and predictive abilities of the 16-mode model were significantly better than for the one-, two-, and four-mode models. Predominantly, edge-aligned modes were selected that are seldom used in CoMFA. Since inclusion of multimode binding only changes the form of the correlation equation and does not affect the number of optimized parameters, the improvement is believed to be due to a more realistic description.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Topomer CoMFA: A Design Methodology for Rapid Lead OptimizationJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2003
- How Does the Gibbs Free Energy Evolve in a System Undergoing Coupled Competitive Reactions?Journal of Chemical Education, 1998
- Construction of 3D-QSAR Models Using the 4D-QSAR Analysis FormalismJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1997
- Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Dioxins and Dioxin-like Compounds: Model Validation and Ah Receptor CharacterizationChemical Research in Toxicology, 1995
- Intervals and the deduction of drug binding site modelsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1995
- Structural Analysis of Antibody Specificity: Detailed Comparison of Five Fab′-Steroid ComplexesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1994
- General atomic and molecular electronic structure systemJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1993
- On the prediction of binding properties of drug molecules by comparative molecular field analysisJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1993
- 2-(Oxadiazolyl)- and 2-(thiazolyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidines as agonists and inverse agonists at benzodiazepine receptorsJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1991
- Polychlorinated Dibenzofuran (PCDF) Binding to the Ah Receptor(s) and Associated Enzyme Induction. Theoretical Model Based on Molecular ParametersQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 1987