Validation of a Brief Nurse‐Administered Migraine Assessment Tool
- 13 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
- Vol. 44 (4) , 328-332
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04076.x
Abstract
Objective.—To validate a brief tool for screening migraine.Background.—Migraine is a common, but underdiagnosed condition. Effective utilization of nonphysician personnel to reliably screen patients for migraine may improve identification of migraineurs for clinical treatment and research.Methods.—An 8‐question Migraine Assessment Tool (based on International Headache Society criteria) was designed for administration by a nurse with no specialized headache training as a pre‐assessment for the diagnosis of migraine for use in either a research or clinical environment. A community sample of 80 adults (71 women, 9 men; mean age, 33.7 years; 80% white, 14% African American, 2.5% Asian American) with self‐reported headache was recruited through advertisements. A headache specialist independently diagnosed subjects using clinical assessment, and a nurse who works in a balance disorder clinic used the Migraine Assessment Tool. Agreement between physician and nurse‐administered Migraine Assessment Tool diagnoses was determined. Each subject returned in 2 to 4 weeks for a second assessment, administered by the same nurse. Agreement between the 2 diagnoses from the Migraine Assessment Tool was calculated.Results.—Comparison between diagnosis by the physician versus the Migraine Assessment Tool revealed a positive predictive value of 0.85; negative predictive value, 0.84; sensitivity, 0.89; specificity, 0.79; and observed agreement, 0.85. Cohen's kappa reliability measure was 0.69, indicating good test reliability. Interestingly, in 8 of the 12 cases of disagreement, the examiner diagnosing nonmigraine diagnosed analgesic overuse headache. Comparing diagnoses assigned by the 2 separate administrations of the Migraine Assessment Tool revealed a Cohen's kappa of 0.69. Notably, 9 of the 12 cases of nonagreement on the 2 assessments were due to subjects endorsing analgesic overuse in only 1 of the 2 testing sessions.Conclusions.—This study showed good reliability and stability of a new, brief, nurse‐administered migraine questionnaire. In addition, the study also showed that consistency in self‐reporting analgesic overuse within individuals with headache is poor. This suggests the need for repeat questioning about analgesic overuse on subsequent appointments to ensure absence of analgesic overuse headache.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of health care utilization for migraine in England and in the United StatesNeurology, 2003
- Lay versus expert interviewers for the diagnosis of migraine in a large sample of elderly peopleJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2003
- Diagnostic lessons from the Spectrum StudyNeurology, 2002
- Validation of a migraine‐specific questionnaire for use in family studiesEuropean Journal of Neurology, 2001
- Head-HUNT: Validity and Reliability of a Headache Questionnaire in a Large Population-Based Study in NorwayCephalalgia, 2000
- Screening for Migraine in the General Population: Validation of A Simple QuestionnaireCephalalgia, 1998
- Validation of a new instrument for determining migraine prevalenceNeurology, 1994