Job Stress and the Buffering Effect of Supervisory Support
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Group & Organization Studies
- Vol. 15 (1) , 92-104
- https://doi.org/10.1177/105960119001500107
Abstract
This investigation examined the buffering model of social support with respect to the moderating effect of supervisory support on the relationship between job stress and job dissatisfaction for 96 employed graduate and undergraduate business students. Although a cross-sectional design was employed, results are consistent with the hypothesis that supervisory support acts as a stress buffer only for individuals who are relationship—oriented—as measured by Fiedler's (1967) esteem for least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale. Implications for organizational interventions and for linking of leadership theory with the stress-buffering model of supervisory support are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making processPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Social Support and Adjustment to Work: A Longitudinal StudyJournal of Management, 1985
- Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1985
- A person–environment analysis of job stress: A contingency model explanation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- Mentors in OrganizationsGroup & Organization Studies, 1984
- The moderating effects of occupation, age, and urbanization on the relationship between job satisfaction and life satisfactionJournal of Vocational Behavior, 1980
- JOB STRESS, EMPLOYEE HEALTH, AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: A FACET ANALYSIS, MODEL, AND LITERATURE REVIEW1Personnel Psychology, 1978
- Correlates of role indices.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- The contingency model of leadership effectiveness: An evaluationOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973
- "Interaction effects" in the presence of asymmetrical transfer.Psychological Bulletin, 1969