Specific Reading Disability: Differences in Contrast Sensitivity as a Function of Spatial Frequency
- 24 October 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 210 (4468) , 439-440
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7433985
Abstract
Contrast thresholds for sine-wave gratings of spatial frequencies of 2, 4, 12, and 16 cycles per degree were determined for normal and disabled readers at a range of stimulus durations. Normal readers demonstrated monotonically decreasing sensitivity with increasing spatial frequency at exposure durations between 40 and 100 milliseconds. At exposure durations of 150 to 1000 milliseconds, they showed peak sensitivity at 4 cycles per degree. In comparison, disabled readers showed monotonically decreasing sensitivity with increasing spatial frequency at all stimulus durations. The difference in sensitivity pattern across spatial frequencies was greatest at stimulus durations approximately equal to fixation durations during reading.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of stimulus duration on the persistence of gratingsPerception & Psychophysics, 1980
- Reading disability: Spatial frequency specific deficits in visual information storeNeuropsychologia, 1980
- The Effect of Spatial Frequency and Contrast on Visual PersistencePerception, 1979
- The cognitive and neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: A theoretical framework and reviewCognition, 1979
- Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial propertiesVision Research, 1978
- Has the Perceptual Deficit Hypothesis Led Us Astray?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977
- Temporal studies with flashed gratings: Inferences about human transient and sustained channelsVision Research, 1977
- Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Cerebral LesionsScience, 1972
- Contour interactions in visual masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- Post-Retinal Visual StorageThe American Journal of Psychology, 1965