Processing Costs, Market Values, and Consumer Acceptance of Light and Normal Weight Hogs

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study evaluated growth, feed conversion, carcass data, consumer acceptance, palatability factors, and packer and retailer opinions of light weight hogs. Hogs weighing 160 lb. required significantly less feed per hundred lb. of gain at a lower price per lb. of gain than hogs weighing 220 lb. However, the heavier hogs made the faster gains. Packers estimated that procsesing costs were 20% greater for hogs slaughtered under 175 lb. Retailers in general preferred smaller cuts than they were buying. Significantly more consumers considered cuts from the heavier hogs too fat. No differences in tenderness were shown by the Warner-Bratzler shear machine or the taste panel. There was no significant difference in flavor of pork from the two weight groups. Cooking losses in loin roasts from the 220 lb. hogs were significantly higher. Processing costs were higher for light weight hogs, but total wholesale value per hundred lb. live weight was greater for the light weight hogs, thereby offsetting the extra processing costs. Copyright © . .

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: