A sensitivity analysis for subverting randomization in controlled trials
- 5 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 20 (4) , 545-555
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.715
Abstract
In some randomized controlled trials, subjects with a better prognosis may be diverted into the treatment group. This subverting of randomization results in an unobserved non‐compliance with the originally intended treatment assignment. Consequently, the estimate of treatment effect from these trials may be biased. This paper clarifies the determinants of the magnitude of the bias and gives a sensitivity analysis that associates the amount that randomization is subverted and the resulting bias in treatment effect estimation. The methods are illustrated with a randomized controlled trial that evaluates the efficacy of a culturally sensitive AIDS education video. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1998
- Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Subverting Randomization in Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1995
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Observational StudiesPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- How a Court Accepted an Impossible ExplanationThe American Statistician, 1994
- Compliance as an Explanatory Variable in Clinical TrialsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1991
- Statistics and Causal InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Identifiability, Exchangeability, and Epidemiological ConfoundingInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983