A comparison of invasive and non‐invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients
Open Access
- 6 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Diversity and Distributions
- Vol. 10 (5-6) , 387-397
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00105.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologistsTaxon, 2004
- Performance Comparisons of Co-Occurring Native and Alien Invasive Plants: Implications for Conservation and RestorationAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2003
- The impact of an invasive weed Tradescantia fluminensis on native forest regenerationJournal of Applied Ecology, 2001
- Competition between Native Populus deltoides and Invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the Implications for Reestablishing Flooding DisturbanceConservation Biology, 2000
- Acclimation to sudden increase in light favoring an invasive over native trees in subtropical islands, JapanOecologia, 2000
- Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitionsDiversity and Distributions, 2000
- Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plantsPerspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2000
- Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rainforest speciesOecologia, 1998
- Effects of Soil Resources on Plant Invasion and Community Structure in Californian Serpentine GrasslandEcology, 1990
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985