Midazolam for Induction of Anaesthesia in Outpatients: A Comparison with Thiopentone

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Midazolam, a new water-soluble benzodiazepine, with an elimination half-life of approximately 2 h, was compared with thiopentone for induction of general anesthesia in a randomized, single-blind study. The patients were 60 healthy women undergoing legal abortion as outpatients. Midazolam provided smooth and reliable induction of anesthesia with few side-effects. The induction time was considerably longer in the midazolam group (82.3 + 6.1) than in the thiopentone group (45.9 .+-. 1.7 s). The dose of midazolam required for induction was 0.36 .+-. 0.01 mg/kg while that of thiopentone was 6.43 .+-. 0.21 mg/kg. Apnea occurred with a frequency of 1 in the midazolam group and 55% in the thiopentone group, but was of equal duration in both groups. Circulatory conditions were more stable during induction with midazolam, with a slower fall in blood pressure and no change in heart rate. The patients were breathing O2/N2O in proportions of 1:2. To ensure adequate surgical anesthesia, it was necessary to add halothane for short periods for all patients in the midazolam group and for 79% of the thiopentone group. Postoperatively, all patients who had received midazolam, but none induced with thiopentone, had anterograde amnesia which lasted for more than 1 h. All patients in both groups left the hospital after routine postoperative observation for 3-4 h. Venous tolerance was good for both drugs.