Comparison of the EC50s of algal toxicity tests calculated by four methods
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Vol. 6 (10) , 767-770
- https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620061006
Abstract
EC50s (calculated concentrations that would inhibit growth by 50%) of 21 pesticides in unicellular algal toxicity tests were calculated by straight‐line graphical interpolation, moving average interpolation, prohibit analysis, and the binomial method. EC50s of 18 tin compounds were calculated by graphical interpolation, moving average, and probit methods. Results from a total of 187 tests were analyzed. The EC50 values were essentially identical when calculated by each method. Although moving average and probit analyses allow calculation of confidence intervals, there is doubt that they can be used with the quantitative data of algal toxicity tests. In the absence of confidence intervals, only the calculated EC50 is used to express relative toxicity, and straight‐line graphical interpolation, a simple and rapid method, may be used in lieu of more complex statistical methods.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of organotins on growth and survival of two marine diatoms, andChemosphere, 1985
- Notes. Determination of bioactivity of chemical fractions of liquid wastes using freshwater and saltwater algae and crustaceansEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1983
- Algae and crustaceans as indicators of bioactivity of industrial wastes☆Water Research, 1982
- A marine algal bioassay method: Results with pesticides and industrial wastesWater, Air, & Soil Pollution, 1980
- Toxicity of textile mill effluents to freshwater and estuarine algae, crustaceans and fishesEnvironmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological, 1980
- Methods for Calculating an LC50Published by ASTM International ,1977
- Confidence Limits for the LD 50 using the Moving Average-Angle MethodBiometrics, 1959
- A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a ControlJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1955
- Multiple Range and Multiple F TestsPublished by JSTOR ,1955
- DOSAGE‐MORTALITY CORRELATION WITH NUMBER TREATED ESTIMATED FROM A PARALLEL SAMPLE*Annals of Applied Biology, 1949