The standardized fish bioassay procedure for detecting and culturing actively toxic Pfiesteria, used by two reference laboratories for atlantic and gulf coast states.
Open Access
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Environmental Health Perspectives in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 109 (suppl 5) , 745-756
- https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s5745
Abstract
In the absence of purified standards of toxins from Pfiesteria species, appropriately conducted fish bioassays are the "gold standard" that must be used to detect toxic strains of Pfiesteria spp. from natural estuarine water or sediment samples and to culture actively toxic Pfiesteria. In this article, we describe the standardized steps of our fish bioassay as an abbreviated term for a procedure that includes two sets of trials with fish, following the Henle-Koch postulates modified for toxic rather than infectious agents. This procedure was developed in 1991, and has been refined over more than 12 years of experience in research with toxic Pfiesteria. The steps involve isolating toxic strains of Pfiesteria (or other potentially, as-yet-undetected, toxic Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-like species) from fish-killing bioassays with natural samples; growing the clones with axenic algal prey; and retesting the isolates in a second set of fish bioassays. The specific environmental conditions used (e.g., temperature, salinity, light, other factors) must remain flexible, given the wide range of conditions from which natural estuarine samples are derived. We present a comparison of information provided for fish culture conditions, reported in international science journals in which such research is routinely published, and we provide information from more than 2,000 fish bioassays with toxic Pfiesteria, along with recommendations for suitable ranges and frequency of monitoring of environmental variables. We present data demonstrating that algal assays, unlike these standardized fish bioassays, should not be used to detect toxic strains of Pfiesteria spp. Finally, we recommend how quality control/assurance can be most rapidly advanced among laboratories engaged in studies that require research-quality isolates of toxic Pfiesteria spp.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fish bioassay and toxin induction experiments for research on Pfiesteria piscicida and other toxic dinoflagellates: workshop summary.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- Current progress in isolation and characterization of toxins isolated from Pfiesteria piscicida.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- Field ecology of toxic Pfiesteria complex species and a conservative analysis of their role in estuarine fish kills.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- A second species of ichthyotoxic Pfiesteria (Dinamoebales, Dinophyceae)Phycologia, 2001
- Overview and present status of the toxic Pfiesteria complex (Dinophyceae)Phycologia, 2001
- Identification of a P2X7 receptor in GH(4)C(1) rat pituitary cells: a potential target for a bioactive substance produced by Pfiesteria piscicida.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- Reporter gene assay for fish-killing activity produced by Pfiesteria piscicida.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1999
- Fish kills, bottom-water hypoxia, and the toxic Pfiesteria complex in the Neuse River and EstuaryMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1999
- Implications of Harmful Microalgae and Heterotrophic Dinoflagellates in Management of Sustainable Marine FisheriesEcological Applications, 1998
- Fish kills linked to a toxic ambush-predator dinoflagellate:distribution and environmental conditionsMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1995